![]() The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". ![]() This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. The supervisory committee is composed by a group of teachers, lawyers, human rights activists and other people whom Facebook commissions case evaluation that have the potential to guide future decisions about the company’s content policy She also criticized the announcement as 'light on the details of how content moderation will change in. Facebook will end some of its preferential treatment of speech by world. Despite significant public concern about the program, Meta has not effectively addressed the problematic components of your system”, concludes the report, collected by the WSJ.Īccording to the newspaper, more than five million accounts received some type of protection and, due to the lack of human capital, the complaints made against the content of these accounts they were not routinely reviewed. Facebook will end some of its preferential treatment of speech by world leaders, whose remarks that violate rules are much less likely to be censored. “Cross checking is not designed nor implemented in a way that meets the responsibilities of human rights of Meta (parent company of Facebook), nor company values (…). In the report, echoed by the New York newspaperthe committee holds that the second review of «VIP» accounts» makes sensitive content remain undeleted for days or even weeks, something that does not happen with unprivileged accounts, that are deleted or blocked as soon as the violation is detected. Furthermore, these accounts are exempt from some or all sanctions to which regular accounts are exposed for not complying with the rules of the social network.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |